Pridgen v. First Union Bank
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Venezia v. Wells Fargo Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- LISONEL PEREZ v. PEDRO A. JAIMOT AND MARILYN JAIMOT (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- THANH-THUY THI LE v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATION TRUST CO., AS TRUSTEE (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- Thanh-Thuy Thi Le v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Trustee For Morgan Stanley Abs Capital 1 Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- Thanh-Thuy Thi Le v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company As Trustee For Morgan Stanley Abs Capital 1 Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case arises from a mortgage foreclosure. Irene Pridgen previously filed an untimely appeal from the final judgment of foreclosure, and this court dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. Roughly twenty-five months after the foreclosure judgment was rendered, Pridgen filed this appeal, directed to an order scheduling the foreclosure sale.
An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order. Rather, it is a purely administrative, interlocutory step in the judicial sales process. See § 45.031(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). Neither is the order appealed here an appealable nonfinal order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.
In any event, Pridgen’s brief makes no complaint about the order appealed. Rather, all of her arguments challenge the underlying foreclosure judgment, which was not timely appealed. We have no jurisdiction to grant her any relief in that regard. See Beal Bank, S.S.B., Inc. v. Sherwin, 829 So.2d 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Hoyt v. State, 810 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
For these reasons, we dismiss this appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.