Summerall v. State
Summerall v. State
880 So. 2d 714; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6238; 2004 WL 947841
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Summerall v. State
Opinion of the Court
Robert F. Summerall challenges his designation as a sexual predator under the Florida Sexual Predators Act (“the Act”), section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2003). He argues that the Act is unconstitutional as a violation of procedural due process. We affirm. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2003). In so doing, we certify conflict with the Third District’s opinion in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.