Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 7, 2004 · Orfinger, Pleus, Sawaya
881 So. 2d 563; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438; 2004 WL 1584926 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wilson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s latest appeal and affirm. Moreover, we hold that his successive petitions constitute an abuse of the judicial system. See, e.g., Carlisle v. State, 849 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we order Wilson to show cause within 30 days from the date of this opinion why he should not be precluded from filing any further pro se pleadings raising these issues in this criminal case. See, e.g., State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999); Steele v. State, 859 So.2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.