Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Blakely v. State

Blakely v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 30, 2004 · Barfield, Webster, Wolf
881 So. 2d 691; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12739; 2004 WL 1920062 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Blakely v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla. 2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 *692So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2002).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑