Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Williams v. State

Williams v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 14, 2004 · Fulmer, Stringer, Wallace
884 So. 2d 138; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10457; 2004 WL 1562069 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Williams v. State

Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Judge.

Kenneth L. Williams seeks review of the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Williams’ motion was based in part on a claim of newly discovered evidence that was facially insufficient. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to Williams’ right to file a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm without comment the trial court’s summary denial of Williams’ other claims.

Affirmed without prejudice to Williams’ right to refile a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case.

FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.