Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Stokes v. State

Stokes v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 6, 2004 · Stringer, Villanti, Wallace
884 So. 2d 240; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11680; 2004 WL 1752181 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Stokes v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Dixon v. State, 812 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 831 So.2d 671 (Fla. 2002). As this court did in both Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950, 2003 WL 21697171 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

STRINGER, VILLANTI, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.