Bloodworth v. State
Bloodworth v. State
884 So. 2d 381; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13471; 2004 WL 2008410
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bloodworth v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1993). We do not consider the State’s request to correct a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order because the error was not brought to the trial court’s attention by way of a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.