Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Bloodworth v. State

Bloodworth v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 10, 2004 · Covington, Kelly, Wallace
884 So. 2d 381; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13471; 2004 WL 2008410 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bloodworth v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1993). We do not consider the State’s request to correct a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order because the error was not brought to the trial court’s attention by way of a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).

COVINGTON, KELLY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.