Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Stanford v. State

Stanford v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 24, 2004 · Casanueva, Salcines, Silberman
884 So. 2d 400; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160; 2004 WL 2112725 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Stanford v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Terry v. State, 808 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 2002); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Shaw v. State, 780 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 2003 WL 21697171, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.14, 2004).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑