Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

J. M. v. State

J. M. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 6, 2004 · Gross, Shahood, Warner
884 So. 2d 481; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657; 2004 WL 2251871 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

J. M. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm J.M.’s conviction for burglary. While J.M. claimed that she entered the dwelling to retrieve her own property, she admitted to her stealthy entry in the middle of the night. Section 810.07, Florida Statutes (2002), establishes that proof of stealthy entry is prima facie evidence of entering with intent to commit an offense. The statutory presumption is sufficient to create a prima facie case and avoid a judgment of acquittal. See Thomas v. State, 655 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (finding defendant’s self-serving statements for reason for breaking into home in early hours of morning did not negate statutory presumption so as to preclude submission of case to jury to evaluate defendant’s explanation along with presumption).

Although appellant also challenges the admission of hearsay evidence, we conclude that the admission of the evidence, even if improper, was harmless.

Affirmed.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.