McGraw v. State
McGraw v. State
886 So. 2d 261; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15882; 2004 WL 2391086
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McGraw v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, concluding that the issues with respect to the use of a permissive presumption and the prosecutor’s closing argument were not preserved for review. As to appellant’s claim that counsel conceded guilt to a charged crime without his consent, we affirm without prejudice to appellant raising the issue in a motion for postconviction relief.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.