Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Hinton v. Hinton

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 12, 2004 · Peterson, Pleus, Sawaya

886 So. 2d 336; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17167; 2004 WL 2559681 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Smith v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order dated and filed November 18, 2003, is affirmed. We write to bring to the attention of the trial court that the order refers to an Exhibit “A” that was to be attached to the order but was inadvertently omitted. We remand for amendment of the order so that the missing Exhibit “A”, an amortization schedule, may be attached.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.