Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C.

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C., 886 So. 2d 433 (2004)
2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17318; 2004 WL 2600431
Benton, Booth, Wolf

Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C.

Opinion of the Court

WOLF, C.J.

Appellant appeals an award of attorneys’ fees and costs based on a proposal for settlement made by appellees pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, and sections 45.061 and 768.79, Florida Statutes. We must reverse because the proposal for settlement was invalid as it failed to state the amount and terms attributable to each defendant as required by rule 1.442(c)(3). See Hilyer Sod, Inc. v. Willis Shaw Express, Inc., 817 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), approved, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2003).

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Margaret HAMMELL v. TAD PROPERTIES, L.L.C., d/b/a Microtel Inn & Suites Lake City, Florida, and Lake City Hospitality, Inc., a foreign corporation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published