Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Padilla v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 24, 2004 · Gross, Hazouri

888 So. 2d 131; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17894; 2004 WL 2729751 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hughes v. State (Fla. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects the order summarily denying Mr. Padilla’s rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence. However, one of his grounds for relief asserted that the assessment of 160 victim injury points for sexual penetration on his sentencing guideline scoresheet, resulting in a sentence of more than nineteen years for each of two second degree felonies, violated Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As to that ground, we again certify as a question of great public importance the same issue certified by Figarola v. State, 841 So.2d 576 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and *132Hughes v. State, 826 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002):

DOES THE RULING ANNOUNCED IN APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), APPLY RETROACTIVELY?

GROSS, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.