Walls v. State
Walls v. State
888 So. 2d 724; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18769; 2004 WL 2823458
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Walls v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the trial court’s refusal to allow defendant to withdraw his plea. His motion was timely, and therefore the issue is preserved. See Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1992) (mail box rule applied to prisoner filings; papers deemed filed when placed in hands of prison authorities for mailing). The record discloses beyond any doubt that the trial court failed to advise defendant of the mandatory minimum penalties that would have to be assessed. On remand the court shall allow defendant to withdraw his plea and begin anew.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.