Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Moran v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 10, 2004 · Griffin, Sharp, Thompson

888 So. 2d 729; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18862; 2004 WL 2827239 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sage v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, J.

Walter William Moran appeals his convictions for two counts of lewd and lascivious molestation. We affirm his convictions and the trial court’s order declaring Moran to be a sexual predator. Relying upon Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), Moran alleges that his proce*730dural due process rights were violated when he was designated a sexual predator. This court has previously held that the act is constitutional and does not violate a defendant’s procedural due process rights. Rickman v. State, 871 So.2d 810 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). We certify conflict with Es-pindola.

AFFIRMED. CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SHARP, W., and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.