Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank, 890 So. 2d 1152 (2004)
2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19093; 2004 WL 2964720
Allen, Benton, Davis

Rudy v. Merchants & Southern Bank

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an attorney’s fee and costs award which was made under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and section 768.79, Florida Statutes, based on the appellant’s failure to accept a joint proposal for settlement offered by the ap-pellees. However, the proposal did not state the settlement amount attributable to each of the appellees, as required under rule 1.442(c)(3) and Willis Shaw Express v. Hilyer Sod, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2003). The appealed order is therefore reversed.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Steven Lee RUDY v. MERCHANTS & SOUTHERN BANK, G. Thomas Mallini, Individually, and Regina Potter, Individually
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published