Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Miami-Dade County v. Laureiro

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 24, 2004 · Dauksch, James, Levy, Schwartz

894 So. 2d 268; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17877; 2004 WL 2730776 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

SUSAN MATRISCIANI v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
SUSAN MATRISCIANI v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Harrell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Cases v. Gray (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the verdict may include amounts for medical bills beyond those actually paid by Medicare, the judgment under review, while otherwise affirmed, is vacated and the cause remanded on the authority of Thyssenkrupp Elevator Co. v. Lasky, 868 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review dismissed, 873 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 2004) and Cooperative Leasing, Inc. v. Johnson, 872 So.2d 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review granted, 884 So.2d 22 (Fla. Case no. SC04-1021, September 10, 2004)(table). As stated in Thyssenkrupp, 868 So.2d at 550,

[o]n remand the trial court is authorized to receive such evidence as may be necessary to fix the precise amount of the reduction [if any] required by our decision today.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.