Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2004

Frazier v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 6, 2004 · Allen, Kahn, Polston

934 So. 2d 474; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1153; 2004 WL 221043 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Rickman v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Smith v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Powers v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Metaxotos v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Sigler v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Carter v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Black v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Littlefield v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Concluding that section 775.21, Florida Statutes, the Florida Sexual Predators Act, does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution, we affirm the order under review. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Givens v. State, 851 So.2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with the decision in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

ALLEN, KAHN and POLSTON, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.