Esmurdoc v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Esmurdoc v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
934 So. 2d 486; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15408; 2004 WL 2347566
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
As DaimlerChrysler Corporation is neither a party to the contract containing the arbitration clause nor a third-party beneficiary of the arbitration clause, we reverse the trial court’s order which stayed the suit and referred it to arbitration. The case is remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.