Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Banks v. State

Banks v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 7, 2005 · Per Curiam
916 So. 2d 35; 2005 WL 3295750 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Banks v. State

Cases that cite this one

48 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

916 So.2d 35 (2005)

Robert E. BANKS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D05-3388.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 7, 2005.

Appellant, pro se.

Charlie Christ, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order of October 6, 2005, as well as the appellant's supplemental response filed in this Court on October 19, 2005, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Similar to an order denying indigency status, an interlocutory order granting indigency status and imposing a lien on a prisoner's trust account for payment of court costs and fees is not an immediately appealable order. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant's right to seek review of the order imposing a lien upon entry of an appealable order. Statton v. Crosby, 912 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (reviewing order denying petition for writ of mandamus and vacating order of indigency to the extent that it imposed a lien on appellant's inmate trust account); Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.