Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Bell v. State

Bell v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 24, 2005 · Per Curiam
895 So. 2d 1290; 2005 WL 673296 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bell v. State

Opinion

895 So.2d 1290 (2005)

Ellis D. BELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-3762.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 24, 2005.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lamya A. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm because a claim under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(c)(1) that a defendant should have been sentenced by the judge who accepted the plea must be preserved to be cognizable on appeal. See Davis v. State, 677 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.