Contrera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Vitiello v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Clifton v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- Taylor v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Thomas E. CONTRERA, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se, for Appellant.
John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
WEBSTER, J.
In this appeal from an adverse final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, we have previously afforded appellant an opportunity to supplement the record with the transcript of the hearing held before the appeals referee. Contrera v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D2789, ___ So.2d ___, 2004 WL 2870073 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec.10, 2004). The time allotted has now run, and no supplemental record has been filed. Accordingly, as we warned in our prior opinion, we are constrained to affirm. Id. (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) for the proposition that, because decisions of lower tribunals are presumed to be correct, such a decision which rests on resolution of disputed issues of fact must be affirmed in the absence of a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or trial).
AFFIRMED.
WOLF, C.J. and BARFIELD, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.