Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Diaz v. State

Diaz v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 2, 2005 · Per Curiam
910 So. 2d 894; 2005 WL 2105940 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Diaz v. State

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

910 So.2d 894 (2005)

Ruben DIAZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D04-4365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 2, 2005.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Pamela Presnell, Assistant Public Defender; Ruben Diaz, pro se, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener's error contained in the written judgment. The judgment erroneously cites to section 893.135(5), Florida Statutes, when the correct statutory citation for the offense of a violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corruption Organization Act as charged against appellant is section 895.03, Florida Statutes (2002).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

BENTON, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.