Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Craig v. State

Craig v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 30, 2005 · Cope, C.J., and Fletcher and Cortiã‘as
934 So. 2d 523; 2005 WL 3180596 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Craig v. State

Opinion

934 So.2d 523 (2005)

Ronald Lee CRAIG, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D04-2305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 30, 2005.
Rehearing Denied May 4, 2006.

Ronald Lee Craig, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, C.J., and FLETCHER and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

*524 PER CURIAM.

Ronald Lee Craig appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. While the procedural history is somewhat complicated, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's Rule 3.850 claims and denied relief. Because the trial court's ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm. See Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1997). We need not reach the State's alternative argument that the motion was time-barred.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.