Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N

Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 8, 2005 · Per Curiam
894 So. 2d 1087; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2921; 2005 WL 525567 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

894 So.2d 1087 (2005)

Rayfield LANE, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 1D04-2654.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 8, 2005.

Rayfield Lane, pro se, petitioner.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Susan Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed below set forth a prima facie basis for relief, the circuit court erred in summarily denying the petition without issuing an order to show cause. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.630(d). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the circuit court's order and remand this cause for further proceedings.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.