Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Renye v. State

Renye v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 5, 2005 · Fulmer, Northcutt, Silberman
890 So. 2d 513; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2; 2005 WL 17429 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Renye v. State

Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Donald Renye challenges the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without comment as to Renye’s first claim. As to Renye’s second claim that his sentence and conviction are illegal because they violate the prohibition against double jeopardy, we affirm. We write only to clarify that Renye received one life sentence for a capital felony; therefore his sentence is not illegal. See §§ 782.04, 775.082, Fla. Stat. (1995). As in Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), we do not reach the merits of a challenge to Renye’s convictions or address whether the trial court’s practice of merging convictions is proper because such claims are not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Affirmed.

FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.