Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford
Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford
890 So. 2d 1248; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 233; 2005 WL 94707
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING and MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
The opinion filed October 27, 2004 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.
We reverse the trial court’s order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.’s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So.2d 532 (Fla. 2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.).
The motion for clarification is denied.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.