Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, 890 So. 2d 1248 (2005)
2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 233; 2005 WL 94707
Fletcher, Green, Wells

Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING and MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

The opinion filed October 27, 2004 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.

We reverse the trial court’s order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.’s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So.2d 532 (Fla. 2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.).

The motion for clarification is denied.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reference

Full Case Name
Keith DIAMOND and Deborah Diamond, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. The AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CT., Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published