Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Schmitz v. Schmitz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING and MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
The opinion filed October 27, 2004 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.
We reverse the trial court’s order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.’s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So.2d 532 (Fla. 2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.).
The motion for clarification is denied.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.