The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion alleging an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the appellant has stated a facially sufficient claim that he is entitled to resentencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), on Count II for robbery with a firearm, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider this claim. His claim regarding Count I is without merit. See § 921.001(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.