Martin v. State
Martin v. State
894 So. 2d 307; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2018; 2005 WL 418704
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.