Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Guzzardo v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 11, 2005 · Monaco, Peterson, Torpy

894 So. 2d 1088; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3229; 2005 WL 562666 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sipple v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this probation violation case, the State properly concedes that the trial court erred by failing to follow any of the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d) and Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), before requiring Appellant to proceed to hearing without benefit of counsel. The judgment and sentence are, therefore, reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.