Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Gregor v. State

Gregor v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 11, 2005 · Orfinger, Pleus, Torpy
894 So. 2d 1090; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3215; 2005 WL 562751 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gregor v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Stuart John Gregor pled nolo contendere to the charge of carrying a concealed firearm, reserving the right to appeal. We affirm. The trial court correctly concluded that the police had a reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry1 stop based on information regarding Gregor’s possession of the firearm, which came from a “citizen informant” rather than an “anonymous informant.” See State v. Maynard, 783 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2001).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.