Satahoo v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Satahoo v. State, 895 So. 2d 1195 (2005)
2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2044; 2005 WL 415980
Cope, Green, Shepherd

Satahoo v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.

Reference

Full Case Name
Philip SATAHOO, a/k/a David Taylor v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published