Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Luma v. State

Luma v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 23, 2005 · Cope, Shepherd, Wells
895 So. 2d 1202; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2025; 2005 WL 418705 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Luma v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.