Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Cancio v. Target Stores

Cancio v. Target Stores
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 30, 2005 · Cortinas, Suarez, Wells
897 So. 2d 550; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4370; 2005 WL 714056 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cancio v. Target Stores

Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Juan J. Cancio appeals from an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission dismissing as untimely his appeal of a decision denying him benefits. We affirm.

Cancio does not claim that he did not receive the appeals referee’s decision, or that he received it too late to file a timely reply. See Guerrero v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 855 So.2d 266, 268-69 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The Commission, therefore, properly dismissed his appeal as it was not filed within twenty days of the date that the referee’s decision was mailed to him. § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); Guerrero, 855 So.2d at 268 (“Under section 443.151(4)(b)3 of the Florida Statutes, an aggrieved party has twenty days after mailing or delivery of a referee’s decision to initiate an appeal with the UAC. Failure to perfect an appeal within twenty days subjects a claim to dismissal under Florida Administrative Code Rule 60BB-7.006. There are no good cause exceptions to this dismissal rule”).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.