Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Rose v. Rose

Rose v. Rose
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 20, 2005 · Green, Ramirez, Suarez
898 So. 2d 1216; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5447; 2005 WL 901189 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rose v. Rose

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943)(“We do not deny the right of litigants to settle controversies out of court but any such settlement without the knowledge or notice to counsel and the payment of their fees is fraud on them whether there was an intent to do so or not.”); Knott v. Knott, 395 So.2d 1196, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Young v. Young, 322 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.