Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Rudolf v. Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 20, 2005 · Griffin, Sharp, Thompson

901 So. 2d 423; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7542; 2005 WL 1186312 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING FEES

SHARP, W., J.

We grant the motion for clarification as follows. This court has determined that appellee is entitled to appellate attorney’s fees pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, conditioned upon the trial court determining that the offer of judgment was properly made and submitted and that appellee is otherwise entitled to fees pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. Appellee is not entitled to appellate attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes.

Motion for Clarification GRANTED.

THOMPSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.