Wooden v. State
Wooden v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Joe Wooden, challenges the trial court’s assessment of various costs following his vehicular manslaughter conviction. Because the trial court erred in imposing two of the challenged costs, we reverse as to only those costs.
As the State concedes, the trial court erred in assessing a $50 “Crimes Preven
We, therefore, REVERSE the assessment of those costs without prejudice to the trial court to reimpose any authorized costs after following the appropriate procedures. See Smiley, 704 So.2d at 195. Appellant’s conviction and all other aspects of his sentence are AFFIRMED. See Ridgeway v. State, 892 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.