Smith v. State
Smith v. State
902 So. 2d 905; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8116; 2005 WL 1279903
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm without discussion Appellant’s convictions and sentence for burglary of a structure and grand theft upon revocation of his probation. The order of revocation shows violations of conditions one, four, five, twenty-seven, and thirty-six. At the revocation hearing, the trial court found that he had violated only conditions four and five. We therefore remand only for correction of the written order of revocation.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions to amend the order of revocation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.