Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 1, 2005 · Casanueva, Larose, Villanti
902 So. 2d 905; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8116; 2005 WL 1279903 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion Appellant’s convictions and sentence for burglary of a structure and grand theft upon revocation of his probation. The order of revocation shows violations of conditions one, four, five, twenty-seven, and thirty-six. At the revocation hearing, the trial court found that he had violated only conditions four and five. We therefore remand only for correction of the written order of revocation.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions to amend the order of revocation.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.