Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Bagienski v. Bagienski

Bagienski v. Bagienski
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 8, 2005 · Gross, Shahood, Stevenson
902 So. 2d 978; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9103; 2005 WL 1335247 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bagienski v. Bagienski

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Final Judgment appealed on all issues raised. We write only on the entitlement to permanent periodic alimony holding that appellee, wife, has the present need for permanent periodic alimony and appellant, husband, has the present ability to pay.

Recognizing that the case is a close one, we affirm as to the amount. The husband’s expenses are low, because he has been living with his parents. A change in these circumstances may well justify a downward modification of alimony.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.