Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Bradley v. State

Bradley v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 30, 2005 · Altenbernd, Northcutt, Stringer
903 So. 2d 221; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4323; 2005 WL 711711 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bradley v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gipson v. State, 616 So.2d 992 (Fla. 1993); State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1991); Castle v. State, 330 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1976); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 888 So.2d 621 (Fla. 2004); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Ishmael v. State, 735 So.2d 509 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Plowman v. State, 586 So.2d 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

After this court held in Boyd, 880 So.2d at 728, that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the Fifth District in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), reversed a circuit court order denying a rule 3.800(a) motion and remanded for consideration of the claim of vindictive sentencing raised in the motion. We certify direct conflict with Johnson.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.