Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Luma v. State

Luma v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 8, 2005 · Fletcher, Gersten, Ramirez
903 So. 2d 302; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8558; 2005 WL 1342505 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Luma v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Forcelledo v. State, 898 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(“The State *303is allowed to give notice under as many classifications as it chooses, where the State is prepared to show the defendant meets the statutory criteria.”); Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(notice deficiency does not render a sentence “illegal” for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition; claim should have been raised via 3.850 and is now time barred).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.