Martinez v. State
Martinez v. State
904 So. 2d 473; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6477; 2005 WL 1027147
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Martinez v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant’s vindictive sentencing claim may not be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Gonzalez v. State, 897 So.2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Reese v. State, 896 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.