Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Zambrana v. State

Zambrana v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 6, 2005 · Green, Ramirez, Rothenberg
906 So. 2d 330; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10474; 2005 WL 1559681 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Zambrana v. State

Opinion of the Court

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for clarification of the sentences imposed in case numbers 99-25569 and 01-25865(A) which she claims should reflect the imposition of concurrent sentences. As the trial court has subsequently conformed the written judgments and sentences to reflect its oral pronouncement and has now corrected the sentences to run concurrent, we conclude that the defendant’s appeal is now moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.