Brantley v. State
Brantley v. State
907 So. 2d 688; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11842; 2005 WL 1788883
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Brantley v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant challenges the denial of a motion to suppress, after which he entered a nolo plea. Because the plea was entered without reserving any issue for appeal, the ruling which the appellant challenges is not reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2). The appellant’s convictions are therefore affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.