Puzio v. State
Puzio v. State
908 So. 2d 521; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10073; 2005 WL 1523386
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Puzio v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Insofar as appellant’s claims included a sentencing challenge based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we note that this decision does not apply retroactively to appellant’s sentence which became final in 1998. See Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2005).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.