Carreno v. State
Carreno v. State
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner, Andres Carreno, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, seeking permission to file a belated appeal. We deny the petition.
After conducting an evidentiary hearing at which Carreno’s first and second chair trial attorneys testified, as did Carreno himself, the Commissioner submitted his report wherein he concluded that there was no credible evidence presented to support the defendant’s claim in this petition.
We have reviewed both the well-reasoned report of the Commissioner and the transcript of the proceedings and conclude, as did the Commissioner, that the defendant did not timely request that his trial attorney file an appeal after pleading guilty to the charges. We thank the Commissioner for assisting the court, and deny the defendant’s petition seeking a belated appeal.
Petition denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.