Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Bufalo

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Bufalo
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 24, 2005 · Gunther, Taylor, Warner
909 So. 2d 464; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13302; 2005 WL 2016829 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Bufalo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the appellee concedes, the lower court erred when it granted a new trial on damages alone, in this slip-and-fall case, without first granting a motion for additur. See Waxman v. Truman, 792 So.2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); § 768.74, Fla. Stat. (2004). Before a new trial on damages can be awarded, section 768.74, Florida Statutes, requires the trial court to “review the amount of such award to determine if such amount is excessive or inadequate” and if so, the court “shall order a remittitur or additur, as the case may be.” § 768.74(1), (2), Fla. Stat. In the instant case, the trial court denied a motion for additur but granted a motion for new trial on damages alone. This was error.

We reverse the order granting the new trial on damages alone and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.