Sonic Automotive v. James
Sonic Automotive v. James
Opinion of the Court
Sonic Automotive and Royal & Sunalliance, the employer and carrier, appeal a workers’ compensation order awarding ap-pellee claimant temporary indemnity benefits, which we affirm, as supported by competent, substantial evidence. We address, however, appellants’ third point, urging that the judge of compensation claims erred in confronting the issue of the major contributing cause of claimant’s need for medical care in that no claim for such benefit had been filed.
The language which appellants take issue with was not placed in the decretal portion of the order, but was instead located under the judge’s findings, wherein it is recited: “There is no medical dispute from a pain management perspective that the
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.