Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Brown v. State

Brown v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 23, 2005 · Casanueva, Salcines, Silberman
911 So. 2d 216; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14917; 2005 WL 2319775 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Brown v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). As this court did in Alexander, we certify the same question of great public importance:

ARE ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ABOUT THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT’S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN OTHERWISE FACIALLY SUFFICIENT MOTION COGNIZABLE AS *217AN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM?

Affirmed; question certified.

CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑