Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Mills v. State

Mills v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 19, 2005 · Kahn, Padovano, Wolf
911 So. 2d 850; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14679; 2005 WL 2254115 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Mills v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch*851field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑