Mills v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Mills v. State, 911 So. 2d 850 (2005)
2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14679; 2005 WL 2254115
Kahn, Padovano, Wolf

Mills v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch*851field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Henry E. MILLS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published